I decided not to talk
about this…”man” (surely he’s not a politician). Not because of the reasons you
might think, just because I’m not American. I trust them, I trust their votes,
they’re intelligent.
But…what IF he’ll be
the next President? Which I personally consider impossible. In that case it
would become a worldwide problem. I mean: banning all Muslims from America?!
That’s enough! One Hitler was enough! There couldn’t be a bigger gift to
terrorists. Given his steady consensus, I’ve changed my mind and here I am.
What’s his political
tactic anyway? Or should we call it hysteria? Surely he has done a big favour
to his fellow GOP contenders. Let’s also remember that those contenders have
previously received money from Trump when he wasn’t running. When you use for
your own purposes all the trash of a Country to tap into in order to win the
race, can you call it tactic or merely opportunism? When you exploit racial
tensions, religion tensions and terrorism for your interest and not for the
higher interests of your Country, can you call it tactic? Can a frontrunner be
called that way if he doesn’t play by the rules? Surely it works wonderfully:
polls speak for themselves. But what kind of “man” are you? In my view that’s
like buying your (controversial) votes, nothing less!
In my Country we had a
“man” like that who won the elections making easy promises and we learned our
bitter lesson the hard way: almost got kicked out of the European Union. That
“man” was Berlusconi. Donald Trump is just appealing to racism and general
anger, he goes straight to xenophobia. How convenient. What’s left? Oh, yes:
mass deportation of American Muslims. That could be a little bit problematic,
though, because so many of them are in the Army….ouch! Much easier with the
Mexicans….(?)
But I don’t think the
“unthinkable” will really happen, as he leads among Republicans but not among
all Americans, Democrats included obviously. It’s not up to me to decide if
remaining contenders would be up to their future job, whereas they certainly
are too many now and this is also pushing Trump ahead.
He’s defying all the
rules for one reason: the more he’s outrageous, the more he dominates the
coverage thanks to TV networks which are interested merely in increasing their
audience. And that is free, abundant advertisement for Trump as he grabs the
spotlight every single day. One thing Trump could do if elected would certainly
be to rewrite the Constitution and sadly the Thirteenth Amendment would allow
that: I can only imagine the treacherous consequences. Banning all Muslims from
America would be nothing compared: as I already said, one Hitler had been more
than enough.
A ban ridiculous and
dangerous: he’ll be realizing this very soon when his own business in the
Middle East diminishes. Maybe even the polls are ridiculous: not to be
misunderstood I’ll remember you December 2007 had Clinton with an 18 points
lead over Obama. Who’s the President now? Trump might capture the GOP
nomination only because is threatening to run as an independent, but is it
meaningful given the way he’s campaigning?
In more than one
previous posts I said that this is exactly what ISIS want: every Muslim to feel
alienated. Thank God now the President is Obama. Trump, with his infantile
threats of massive bombings (bombs: a very simple solution for an extremely
complicated problem) is merely doing an enormous damage to Obama’s ability to
lead a coalition. Unrealistic claims made by a xenophobic man. When enough will
be enough?!
When Trump will be
nominated as the GOP presidential nominee. But at that point it’ll be too late:
they will lose total control over the image of their party, besides of course
losing the presidential election, that’s for sure and that’s what they deserve.
So what are they ready to do to stop this pseudo-Hitler?
America should be a
more confident nation unafraid to welcome newcomers. One of its founding
principles is freedom of religion: among those who founded America were those
fleeing religious persecution.
Dump Trump. No more
words are needed.
….Always humble,
Angiolino
No comments:
Post a Comment