Do you remember the period of alcohol Prohibition? Do you also recall
what happened afterwards? Here we are again with marijuana, which is less
harmful than alcohol, by the way.
It all comes down to one question: should governments all around the
world decriminalize the use of pot or not? Which directly leads to the first
question: why punish drug users in first place? We know both points are not the
cases. Moral thinking is one thing, the legal point of view is a completely
different matter. We might think that the consequences of using weed are as bad
as….everyone else think, or that a form of punishment is likely to deter its
use. Legal basis? None: threats of punishments don’t deter drug use.
Do we punish smoking, drinking, eating garbage (which we do, a lot!): we
don’t even punish companies producing that kind of stuff. The principle is
exactly the same. Crimes we punish do serious harm to other people, while
smoking pot only harm users themselves. Only in an extremely small minority
they harm their families and we should be very cautious about generalizing.
Efforts to prevent its use cause a greater harm than whatever harms they
would like to prevent. Imagine an adolescent going to prison just for that
reason and his life later ruined forever. THIS is what parents fear, if you
think about it, NOT a little bit of smoking weed. Since legal drugs should be
less dangerous than illegal drugs.
Statistics and criminologists say that the deterrent effects of
punishments for pot use are minimal. It’s certainly not up to me to contradict
them. At most I could say I don’t believe them. Not to mention scientific
consensus: life expectancy of people who have used it is identical to those who
have not. Legal marijuana would also cost less than illegal one, so crime rates
related to finance this habit should fall as well.
Decades of war against pot have produced zero accomplishments: it means
something. On the contrary legalizing it would at least allow governments to
get rid of all producers. We’re all in favor of a healthy lifestyle, but do you
get punished if you don’t exercise?
Think
properly and thoroughly about the basic question: is the principle of fighting
the use of marijuana defensible or not, morally and legally?I already
know what you’re thinking. Yes or no? It’s as simple as that. The
direction appears to be in favour of a legalization. Gradually. Canada,
America and Mexico are already changing some laws. “Changing”
consequently the question: will you accept them or not?
Do you
accept consumption of tobacco and alcohol? Then you should also know that
marijuana is far less harmful and when it’s illegally sold help to fuel
drug-related crimes. How many people already drink and smoke? Be honest to
yourself: don’t you drink a couple of beers in a night out? I would be
more afraid of granting a monopoly over the growing and sale of legal pot to a
limited number of investors. Nobody would gain from that, although I’m afraid
it’ll end up likewise.
Support for
making weed legal is increasing around the world, provided the proper limits of
quantity and legal age are in place. Instead of spending billions on
imprisoning people for violating disputable laws, those money could / should be
better spent for fighting against cultivation and distribution of real, truly
dangerous drugs.
Laws on
banning the growing and possession of marijuana have caused much, much more
damage to society than the little harmful usage itself.
You should
keep that crystal clear in mind before deciding where you stand.
….Always
humble,
Angiolino
No comments:
Post a Comment